Australasian Journal of Philosophy

-

-

-

-

-

-

The editor was very respectful and the review comments were somewhat helpful. The report was clearly fairly positive and read like an R&R. Editors rejected in virtue of the comments not being a "strong" enough positive recommendation and without even sending to a second referee. It also seems to me that a journal *this* determined to reject viable papers for reasons of space, even ignoring what was probably an R&R recommendation, should desk reject more often so as to reduce wait times and allow themselves more space to respect referee reports. Not recommended for those up against any kind of deadline.

-

-

The irresponsible referees found lots of excuses to procrastinate. Sadly, the editor didn't think the wait was very long.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Referee recommended minor revision, but editor rejected it because it is now AJP policy to only accept paper with "strong positive recommendations" from the referee.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-