Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy

-

-

-

-

Originally an R&R with positive reviewer comments. After one round of revision, a referee wanted a few additional changes (largely based on new concerns), and Ergo decided to reject outright because, so they claim, they don't do multiple rounds of revision for some unfathomable reason. Authors can't do anything to prevent reviewers from raising additional concerns post-revision, and Ergo has apparently decided that this should absolutely preclude authors from publishing, after they have poured *hours* into revising and responding carefully to referee comments? Very frustrating.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Swiftly desk rejected but with kind and helpful comments from the Area Editor.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Hey, Mona. Why not stepping down from the editor position if you prefer sitting on the submissions without doing anything for months?

-

-

-

-

-

Very quick. Substantive comments including with rejection.

-

-

-

-