British Journal for the History of Philosophy

-

-

-

-

desk reject with short but useful feedback from associate editor

Desk Rejection

If you are rejecting papers after four months with no comments, then you are not doing your job properly.

-

-

After four months of review, you told me that comments are not available. Go f**k yourself!

-

-

-

-

-

The single reviewer comment I received suggested the paper be improved by arguing a point that I do in fact argue in the paper. While the comments were, on the whole, helpful, it's not clear the reviewer read the paper in its entirety or carefully.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-