Far and away the best journal experience I've had. I have also submitted other papers that were not accepted, and that experience was good too.

-

-

Editor is very unresponsive

-

-

-

I did not get an email notification of my desk reject, and only knew about it because I logged into the system.

-

Desk-rejected but had rather substantial—and helpful—comments from one of the editors.

-

-

-

-

The single reviewer comment I received suggested the paper be improved by arguing a point that I do in fact argue in the paper. While the comments were, on the whole, helpful, it's not clear the reviewer read the paper in its entirety or carefully.

-

-

-

-

Referee recommended minor revision, but editor rejected it because it is now AJP policy to only accept paper with "strong positive recommendations" from the referee.

-

I assume it's a desk rejection without comments. At least that was quick, though not that quick for a desk rejection.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-