-

Originally an R&R with positive reviewer comments. After one round of revision, a referee wanted a few additional changes (largely based on new concerns), and Ergo decided to reject outright because, so they claim, they don't do multiple rounds of revision for some unfathomable reason. Authors can't do anything to prevent reviewers from raising additional concerns post-revision, and Ergo has apparently decided that this should absolutely preclude authors from publishing, after they have poured *hours* into revising and responding carefully to referee comments? Very frustrating.

-

-

-

-

-

Submission for the Isaac Levi prize. Rejection with no comments or other information.

Desk rejection after seven months? Fuck you!

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Desk reject with a couple (brief) helpful comments

Fast desk reject (no comments)

-

Fast desk reject

Fast desk reject

Fast desk reject

-

Are you fucking kidding me? Desk rejection after four months? Go fuck yourself!

The irresponsible editor didn't send the paper to referees after three months.

-

-

-

-