-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Glad for the quick rejection. The reason was that the paper felt like a response piece. It isn't, and is now accepted at a journal of roughly equal (or slightly better) stature.

One of my best experiences as an author. Good comments from reviewers and the editorial team. Feels like the journal wants to publish papers made better through the review process rather than looking for reasons to reject.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Given that the report is very straightforward, I don't understand why the editor still took very long to make the decision.

-

-

-

-

-

-